QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	60.2 GB free of 63.999 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '22 at 21:22
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC 153 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 61.8 1-Core 107 2-Core 214 69% 128 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 839 75% 634 Pts	64-Core 1,634 101% 1,634 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.3% Below average	Lighting 39.1 Reflection 40.9 Parallax 42 32% 40.7 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 37.9 Splatting 27 27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$33 33,719 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: AAXA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 560 437 438 436 407 378 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 1,022 Write 472 Mixed 490 SusWrite 443 134% 607 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 69.4 4K Mixed 34 119% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 599 DQ Write 410 DQ Mixed 510 379% 506 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 216%
Samsung MZ1LB3T8HMLA-00007 4TB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 245% 1TB free Firmware: EDB7202Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 589 588 595 594 594 594 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Read 736 Write 607 Mixed 635 SusWrite 592 144% 642 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 76.1 4K Mixed 46 145% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 673 DQ Write 488 DQ Mixed 508 399% 556 MB/s
Poor: 137% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 291%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 63GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16383 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	MC Read 52 MC Write 39.7 MC Mixed 60.1 145% 50.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 28.3 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 123 33% 123 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 159%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	21x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $350Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	30x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	141x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	74x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $350

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406