PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z270 Killer SLI/BR (all builds) |
Memory | 10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161205 |
Uptime | 2.5 Days |
Run Date | Mar 24 '22 at 01:09 |
Run Duration | 220 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
|
86%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ430400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 75 53 22 50 32 MB/s
|
38.4%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
60GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 59 58 58 MB/s
|
33.4%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
772GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 169 171 171 170 168 MB/s
|
91.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 8502 2400 C15 Series 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
62.3%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 16x |
Core i5-7600KIntel $170Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 11x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 5x |
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 5x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 99% - Outstanding | Total price: $458 |