Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-CB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-CB  (all builds)
Memory38.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190808
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateMar 24 '22 at 06:51
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 242
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 722
65% 549 Pts
64-Core 981
61% 981 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 221
Reflection 211
Parallax 200
180% 211 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 154
Splatting 137
130% 163 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
566GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 803 824 1109 885 852 769 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,536
Write 1,353
Mixed 1,098
SusWrite 874
272% 1,215 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 45.2
154% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 859
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 901
642% 821 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 197%
Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
926GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 309 394 334 329 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 374
Write 360
Mixed 325
SusWrite 325
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 33.3
108% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 349
263% 353 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
931GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 309 395 334 328 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 365
Write 356
Mixed 331
SusWrite 325
78% 344 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 30.8
105% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 348
263% 351 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4BL.M8FB1 859B BL16G32C16U4WL.M16FE 859B BL16G32C16U4BL.M8FB1 859B BL16G32C16U4WL.M16FE 64GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 25.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 14
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-CB Builds (Compare 1,450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-CB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $534
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback