Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82JF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive423% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 82JF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '22 at 17:08
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 74.8
1-Core 160
2-Core 315
97% 183 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 879
92% 738 Pts
64-Core 1,107
68% 1,107 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Legend(17AA 3E86) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7256
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Lighting 96.6
Reflection 87.4
Parallax 86.3
79% 90.1 fps
MRender 77.5
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 66.1
58% 71.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL2 512GB
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9L1QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3002 3258 3269 781 757 761 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
423% Outstanding
Read 3,006
Write 2,849
Mixed 2,975
SusWrite 1,971
608% 2,700 MB/s
4K Read 84.1
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 117
389% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,483
DQ Write 1,266
DQ Mixed 1,346
1,016% 1,365 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 423%
Great: 404%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.6 1 2.5 2.1 2.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
2.26% Terrible
Read 6.9
Write 0.7
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 1.9
3% 2.92 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.26%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.4% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 23.2
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 19.2
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82JF Builds (Compare 1,132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 82JF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback