Lenovo 20S1S3CW05

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 34% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20S1S3CW05  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20S1S3CW05
Memory15.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '22 at 07:49
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 34%
CPU Throttled 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10610U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Memory 40.9
1-Core 82
2-Core 141
48% 88 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 168
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX330
Legend(17AA 22B0) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7242
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 1.5
4% 3.63 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 1.7
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 449 312 379 273 218 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 615
Write 610
Mixed 591
SusWrite 338
121% 539 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 25.1
88% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 199
137% 172 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44AM0-CWE M471A1K43DB1-CWE 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
45.4% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20S1S3CW05 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20S1S3CW05

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback