Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 106 2-Core 185 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 383 38% 308 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Lighting 16 Reflection 10.3 Parallax 15.1 13% 13.8 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 17.2 Splatting 16 11% 13 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB 7,332 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZD0R025R SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 397 296 157 191 205 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Read 410 Write 392 Mixed 334 SusWrite 271 79% 352 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 36.6 147% 57.5 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 165 142% 202 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 8325 GLAF62F-D8---------- 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	63.1% Good	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 20.1 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 72.1 55% 72.1 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	107x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	67x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	117x
Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 37%, 8,300 samples	78x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	71x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $217