Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 19:17
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 77
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 141
58% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 312
34% 272 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 470
Asus(1043 8347) 1.2GB
CLim: 607 MHz, MLim: 837 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 21.5
15% 23.1 fps
MRender 31.9
Gravity 15
Splatting 20
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 54 58 58 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 128
Write 92.6
Mixed 108
SusWrite 56.5
22% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 21.2
67% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 30.2
28% 42 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 61%
Intel X25-M 80GB
74GB free
Firmware: 2CV102HD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 64 69 70 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 172
Write 75.9
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 67.4
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 8.7
56% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 62.8
DQ Mixed 11.1
17% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29%
Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
850GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 112 113 114 107 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 85.4
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 111
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
2TB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 88 91 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 75.8
Write 90.1
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 88.6
55% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.4% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 13.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 8.7
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback