Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 88.2 2-Core 174 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 440 48% 380 Pts	64-Core 443 27% 443 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1447) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.39% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 7.2 Parallax 2.8 3% 4.7 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 5 4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.39% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB 17,953 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 881GB free (System drive) Firmware: UH450400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 56 73 90 109 192 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 402 Write 353 Mixed 295 SusWrite 104 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 25.3 4K Mixed 11.7 50% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 71.1 DQ Mixed 9.7 30% 65.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Asint SSZ302G08-GGNHC 6GB 204 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 16.3 52% 18 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	303x
GeForce GT 635MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,113 samples	45x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $295Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	13x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	11x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 5,165 samples	60x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	56x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 5,120 samples	15x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16