Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	56.1% Above average	Memory 68.9 1-Core 64.9 2-Core 124 52% 85.9 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 310 35% 275 Pts	64-Core 747 46% 747 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7470 14,835 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 2120) 1GB Driver: atiu9p64.dll Ver. 15.200.1039.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	2.33% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 4 Parallax 2.5 3% 3.23 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 2 Splatting 2.2 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.33% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 250GB SSD 2,686 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 99 100 99 100 100 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.5% Average	Read 263 Write 167 Mixed 196 SusWrite 132 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 32.6 4K Mixed 22 83% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 24.8 DQ Write 40.6 DQ Mixed 29 23% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 105%
SanDisk Cruzer Spark 64GB 1,071 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 53GB free, PID 55a1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 9.6 8.4 9.3 10 9.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	8.48% Terrible	Read 29.8 Write 7.5 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 9.1 15% 13.9 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 2.7 120% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.48% Great: 18%
USB Flash Disk 32GB 218 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 17GB free, PID 2000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 15 11 10 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	6.85% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 6.2 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 11.8 18% 14.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.85% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5... 64GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	65.6% Good	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 25.4 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 5.5 20% 6.97 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	6x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 01stBench 62%, 884 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	1x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	2x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	1x

SSD
Solid State Disk 1TBSpccBench 79%, 17,192 samples	3x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
CS1030 500GB SSDPNYBench 170%, 980 samples	2x

RAM
Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 Samsung M392B5... 64GBUnknownBench 84%, 8 samples	6x
9965516-051.A00LF 8x8GBKingstonBench 89%, 36 samples	1x
9965516-051.A00LF 4x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 20 samples	1x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $130

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16