Asus V-P8H67E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus V-P8H67E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK V-P8H67E
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20120216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '22 at 13:18
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 183
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 442
49% 388 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Elitegroup(1019 1029) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1592 MHz, MLim: 1877 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.1% Average
Lighting 48.1
Reflection 75.7
Parallax 62.1
39% 62 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 58.5
Splatting 58.3
51% 62.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar SSD 240GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 340 164 156 161 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 450
Write 421
Mixed 414
SusWrite 224
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 33.3
106% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 283
235% 338 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81%
Great: 168%
Lexar SSD 120GB
57GB free
Firmware: R1201A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 231 228 230 234 230 MB/s
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.2% Above average
Read 250
Write 221
Mixed 216
SusWrite 227
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 21.9
91% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 33.7
64% 129 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$32
14GB free
Firmware: JC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 102 103 104 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 69.2
Write 73.9
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 102
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
13GB free
Firmware: 3.AHC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 74 72 72 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 79.6
Write 51.5
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 73.1
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 54%
Toshiba MK5065GSXN 500GB
80GB free
Firmware: GH012H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 63 63 62 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 55.2
Write 56.9
Mixed 18.1
SusWrite 62.2
35% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 830B M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 99U5471-012.A00LF 830B M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical V-P8H67E Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus V-P8H67E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $212
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback