Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron M 440 159 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Memory 63.2 1-Core 5.3 2-Core 7.5 23% 25.3 Pts	4-Core 12.2 8-Core 13.3 2% 12.8 Pts	64-Core 5.7 0% 5.7 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HM320HJ 320GB-$69 961 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 276GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AK10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 7.6 5.6 14 41 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Read 59.2 Write 79.7 Mixed 41.2 SusWrite 23 38% 50.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.3 68% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 62%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB 3,948 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 28GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8.6 10 13 11 8.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	3.53% Terrible	Read 8.5 Write 7.7 Mixed 6 SusWrite 10.3 11% 8.12 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.53% Great: 9%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 14,254 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 3.4 2.4 3.2 2.9 3.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 16.6 Write 4.3 SusWrite 3.3 8% 8.07 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0 4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1GB 4,189 User benchmarks, average bench 13% null MHz 512, 1024 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	4.52% Terrible	MC Read 0.3 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 0.4 2% 0.83 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 0.4 SC Mixed 0.1 1% 0.23 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.52% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16