Today's hottest deals

Besstar HM80

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemBesstar HM80  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR HM80
Memory19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '22 at 07:27
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 77
1-Core 146
2-Core 288
91% 170 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 995
94% 780 Pts
64-Core 1,211
75% 1,211 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 30.2
18% 23.6 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 19.9
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-A02 512GB
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 137 57 104 90 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 1,018
Write 920
Mixed 872
SusWrite 85.4
162% 724 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 66.2
239% 93.3 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 59.3
109% 217 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 133%
Great: 202%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
497GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 79 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 78.2
Write 79.9
Mixed 63
SusWrite 79.8
102% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD32D4S2S8ME-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 27.1
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 20.3
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HM80 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Besstar HM80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback