Today's hottest deals

Asus N75SF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus N75SF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N75SF
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110914
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMar 31 '22 at 13:00
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 129
54% 89.5 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 324
34% 272 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
Asus(1043 2051) 2GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 1.9
5% 5.33 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 6
5% 6.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 5%
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 2051) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.64% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 1.6
2% 3.73 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.64%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 22 67 50 79 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 397
Write 348
Mixed 278
SusWrite 80.9
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 10.9
46% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 56.8
DQ Mixed 31.7
37% 64.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.7% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 13.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N75SF Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N75SF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback