Asrockrack ROME2D16-2T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 207%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive430% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrockrack ROME2D16-2T  (all builds)
Memory120.3 GB free of 256 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '22 at 15:48
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 64-Cores
CPU1, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 69.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 280
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 1,090
97% 820 Pts
64-Core 5,258
325% 5,258 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$530
Asus(1043 880E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
137% Outstanding
Lighting 194
Reflection 183
Parallax 171
158% 183 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 144
Splatting 118
124% 157 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 137%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$113
736GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3267 3270 3206 2553 1575 1569 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
430% Outstanding
Read 2,776
Write 3,273
Mixed 3,016
SusWrite 2,573
658% 2,910 MB/s
4K Read 75.1
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 102
330% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,460
DQ Write 1,172
DQ Mixed 1,288
972% 1,307 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 430%
Great: 477%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$53
236GB free
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 883 341 345 339 261 353 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,712
Write 1,993
Mixed 139
SusWrite 420
288% 1,316 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 92.3
317% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,326
DQ Write 1,039
DQ Mixed 581
598% 982 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 285%
Great: 311%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 445 445 445 445 445 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 448
Mixed 416
SusWrite 446
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 26.9
129% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 40.9
78% 155 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130
7TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 168 181 175 182 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 118
Write 155
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 175
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43DB3-CWE 16x16GB
16 of 16 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
220% Outstanding
MC Read 95.3
MC Write 70
MC Mixed 106
258% 90.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 37.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 146%
This bench: 220%
Great: 220%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROME2D16-2T Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 275%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrockrack ROME2D16-2T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 128% - Outstanding Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback