ECS X77H2-A3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardECS X77H2-A3  (all builds)
Memory30.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '22 at 03:09
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31235
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 182
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 439
48% 379 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 66.5
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 63
54% 65.9 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 62.6
53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 202 162 160 161 172 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 258
Write 304
Mixed 266
SusWrite 168
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 28
92% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 32.6
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 41.7
34% 48.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 99U5471-039.A00LF 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X77H2-A3 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: ECS X77H2-A3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback