Today's hottest deals

Onda ONDA H310C-CD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemOnda ONDA H310C-CD3  (all builds)
MotherboardOnda ONDA H310C-CD3
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 19:49
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4600-$27
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 208
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 306
40% 303 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 7.2
5% 6 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 12.1
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 SATA M.2 128GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JUXA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 377 421 396 420 418 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 430
Mixed 418
SusWrite 405
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 47.5
158% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 322
237% 311 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 98%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
127GB free
Firmware: 0002YXM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 98 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 102
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 102
67% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLH-4G Kingston 9905584-029.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ONDA H310C-CD3 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Onda ONDA H310C-CD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback