Today's hottest deals

Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100323
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 11:37
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$145
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 145
58% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 356
38% 300 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 63.9
54% 67.1 fps
MRender 69.6
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 57.9
51% 63.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 109 96 91 95 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 92.9
Write 145
Mixed 130
SusWrite 95
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 21.7
72% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.6
DQ Write 68.4
DQ Mixed 30.4
28% 40.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34%
Great: 66%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
88GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 85 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 97.6
Write 108
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 84.6
64% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
196% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 14GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
22.3% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.3
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback