Casper NIRVANA NB C600 SILVER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NB C600 SILVER  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER C600 002
Memory16.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '22 at 11:55
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 123
54% 88.2 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 194
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Quanta(152D 1137) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.16% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 6.7
0% 3.3 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 10
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.16%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050M 500GB
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 47 53 52 45 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 76.4
Write 82.3
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 49.7
43% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 60%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 1 1 1.2 0.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
4.81% Terrible
Read 28.6
Write 3.8
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 1
8% 9.53 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.81%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB4GS2400.C8FT 029E CMSX16GX4M1A2400C16 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NB C600 SILVER Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NB C600 SILVER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback