Asus G751JM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G751JM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G751JM
Memory13.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140711
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateSep 28 '17 at 09:44
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User KGZ-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 162
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 384
40% 321 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 171D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 6.69
3% 9.2 fps
MRender 8.24
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.13
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.85%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP600 256GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 479
Write 292
Mixed 356
83% 376 MB/s
4K Read 3.49
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 2.88
11% 3.46 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 97%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
53GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 58.3
Write 59.8
Mixed 36
38% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.13
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.12
35% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 59%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 2TB
246GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 84.4
Write 101
Mixed 98.8
126% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.28
69% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2S8G64CC8HD5N-DI 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10.4
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G751JM Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G751JM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback