Today's hottest deals

Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120914
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 08 '22 at 13:09
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 97.5
44% 69.4 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 268
28% 223 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
Sapphire(174B E148) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
8.3% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 9.8
9% 10.7 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 7.9
7% 8.67 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.3%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 96 100 88 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 215
Write 112
Mixed 139
SusWrite 88.7
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 25.1
92% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 96.5
DQ Mixed 38.3
36% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$75
640GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 96 104 103 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 110
Write 119
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 95.8
69% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
143% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10.2
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 286 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback