Hp-pavilion WC777AA-UUW HPE-120sc

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHp-pavilion WC777AA-UUW HPE-120sc  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI IONA
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '22 at 13:42
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 164
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 356
41% 320 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
EVGA(3842 1313) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.97 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 125 133 132 136 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.5% Average
Read 208
Write 148
Mixed 181
SusWrite 134
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 18.9
65% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 163
125% 171 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CB04 DDR3 1333G 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.4
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WC777AA-UUW HPE-120sc Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion WC777AA-UUW HPE-120sc

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $519
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback