Today's hottest deals

Asus Z170-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics62.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z170-PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '22 at 22:26
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$90
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 141
2-Core 282
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 528
70% 524 Pts
64-Core 494
30% 494 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.6% Good
Lighting 79.8
Reflection 80.9
Parallax 73.5
65% 78.1 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 74.4
Splatting 71
58% 70.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 442
Write 429
Mixed 361
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 56.7
190% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 345
260% 349 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79
91GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 111 112 112 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 47.9
SusWrite 111
68% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 63%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 75 75 76 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 118
Write 110
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 75
69% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
19GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.8 5.4 5.2 5 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.9% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 4.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 4.9
7% 6.15 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 2.9%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 35.1
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 31.9
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-PRO Builds (Compare 1,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-PRO - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $562
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback