Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '22 at 20:47
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	88%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399 38,086 User benchmarks, average bench 91% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 132 2-Core 257 90% 160 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 810 78% 640 Pts	64-Core 1,014 63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.7% Poor	Lighting 37.5 Reflection 41.4 Parallax 38.6 31% 39.2 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 39.2 Splatting 28.2 28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 843GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 364 333 332 341 343 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Read 445 Write 357 Mixed 292 SusWrite 344 81% 360 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 81 4K Mixed 35.4 132% 48.4 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 263 213% 303 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$255 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 2TB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 487 475 480 484 483 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 377 Write 343 Mixed 399 SusWrite 482 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 83.6 4K Mixed 30.6 122% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 352 265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$255 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 1.5TB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 487 475 481 484 483 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 476 Mixed 444 SusWrite 482 108% 479 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 90.4 4K Mixed 50.1 173% 60.3 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 351 264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GF2133C13K4 4x8GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 31.5 MC Mixed 24.6 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 32.3 SC Mixed 25.6 73% 25.7 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	217x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	149x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	106x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	90x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	85x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	45x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	128x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	72x
BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 82%, 12,603 samples	55x

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $597

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16