Today's hottest deals

Lenovo F0D4000DLD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo F0D4000DLD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36DE
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180521
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateApr 09 '22 at 21:23
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 180
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 324
45% 335 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 36DE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 6.9
5% 5.57 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
715GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 123 116 135 115 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 162
Write 165
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 121
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
361GB free, PID a00d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 74 74 74 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 85.3
Write 87.5
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 74.1
93% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 10.7
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 11
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F0D4000DLD Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0D4000DLD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback