Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X505ZA
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190521
Uptime26.3 Days
Run DateApr 10 '22 at 11:44
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 72
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 184
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 533
53% 433 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 10 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 1091) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.20.02
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 21.6
13% 13.4 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 17.8
Splatting 11.9
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 294 304 305 198 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 449
Write 346
Mixed 290
SusWrite 248
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 29.2
87% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 214
152% 196 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
596GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 88 88 90 89 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 128
Write 122
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 88.8
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
238% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 22.5
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 21.3
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA Builds (Compare 237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback