| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Boot Drive | 62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS M730power (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3128-A2 |
| Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180628 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 11 '22 at 23:39 |
| Run Duration | 194 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
58.5%
Above average
|
56% 91.8 Pts
|
33% 249 Pts
|
16% 260 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K2000
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
||||
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 149 133 148 138 140 MB/s
|
62.7%
Good
|
51% 227 MB/s
|
104% 37.2 MB/s
|
152% 210 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR8C 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
21.2%
Poor
|
19% 6.6 GB/s
|
18% 6.37 GB/s
|
44% 90.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 47: 4R 7G 6B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47% | 19% | 90 | 79 | 44 | 60 | 27" | 1920 1080 | BNQ78EC BenQ GL2780 |
History: Score 21: 1R 4G 4B | Score 47: 4R 7G 6B
Typical CELSIUS M730power Builds (Compare 21 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M730power
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 7x |
| Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 6x |
| Xeon E5-2690 v2Intel $142Bench 71%, 1,083 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 5x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 3x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 37% - Below average | Total price: $1,204 |