Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Memory 79.3 1-Core 75.8 2-Core 142 60% 99.1 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 285 31% 247 Pts	64-Core 243 15% 243 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 15F2) 2GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	1.15% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 0.7 1% 1.27 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.15% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 287 284 287 291 284 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 444 Write 411 Mixed 358 SusWrite 300 85% 378 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 32.6 106% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 358 262% 345 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F Kingston 9905428-056.A00G 8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.5% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 13.5 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 11.2 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	398x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	174x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	14x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 25%, 6,552 samples	33x
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 45%, 3,512 samples	32x
SSA302G08-GDJEC 2x4GBAsintBench 47%, 787 samples	21x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $188