Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3450-$95 34,199 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 89.4 2-Core 151 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 287 43% 311 Pts	64-Core 281 17% 281 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 275-$250 3,083 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 82F2) 896MB Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	8.34% Terrible	Lighting 11.7 Reflection 12.4 Parallax 6.1 10% 10.1 fps	MRender 9.7 Gravity 10.2 Splatting 3.7 6% 7.87 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.34% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB 15,968 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM01.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 93 87 99 130 124 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.1% Poor	Read 165 Write 108 Mixed 112 SusWrite 109 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 16.8 4K Mixed 14.6 30% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 89.4 DQ Write 66.8 DQ Mixed 11.3 27% 55.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 99%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 918GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 139 138 133 144 140 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 133 Write 99.3 Mixed 69.9 SusWrite 136 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905474-044.A00LF 2x4GB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 17 52% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 13.8 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	447x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	149x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	113x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $227