Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B550M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C94)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C94
MotherboardMSI MAG B550M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C94)  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '22 at 21:58
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 286
82% 157 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 922
79% 677 Pts
64-Core 1123
70% 1123 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$270
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.10.01.01
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 140
Parallax 238
98% 166 fps
MRender 222
Gravity 124
Splatting 193
148% 180 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SSD 500GB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA12.b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1507 1544 986 766 764 769 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,190
Write 1,541
Mixed 1275
SusWrite 1,056
286% 1,265 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 64.6
227% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1230
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 943
724% 994 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 227%
Great: 240%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23
223GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 447 443 454 453 454 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 458
Mixed 427
SusWrite 449
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 33.6
159% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 48.4
103% 206 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 108%
Great: 92%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
255GB free
Firmware: UH4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 94 121 225 184 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 454
Write 398
Mixed 167
SusWrite 160
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 16.6
80% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 94.6
DQ Mixed 33.9
45% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 58%
Transcend TS120GSSD220S 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: R0510A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 453 454 454 455 451 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 441
Mixed 381
SusWrite 450
97% 429 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 25.9
127% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 40.1
102% 212 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GVR Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
71.7% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 28.2
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 27.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C94) Builds (Compare 2,772 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $670
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback