Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 20 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5540 605 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1366-pin LGA, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 65.3 2-Core 124 56% 89.9 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 360 37% 298 Pts	64-Core 624 39% 624 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.8% Above average	Lighting 61.8 Reflection 69.3 Parallax 61.4 50% 64.2 fps	MRender 59.4 Gravity 64.4 Splatting 64.6 52% 62.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 221 225 229 231 232 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.7% Above average	Read 240 Write 173 Mixed 219 SusWrite 193 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 29.8 4K Mixed 20.4 70% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 181 140% 192 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 125GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 214 225 229 231 232 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.5% Above average	Read 236 Write 175 Mixed 225 SusWrite 188 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 30.7 4K Mixed 20.8 70% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 180 140% 192 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 125%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$160 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 163GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 55 73 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 101 Write 48.8 Mixed 73.4 SusWrite 33.6 48% 64.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M393B5170EH1-CH9 9x4GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 9 of 12 slots used 36GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.7% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 9.4 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.5 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon X5680IntelBench 74%, 4,201 samples	4x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E55401stBench 61%, 605 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro FX 4800NvidiaBench 6%, 2,114 samples	4x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1x

RAM
HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 1089 9965472-006.A00LF 00DA HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 00DA HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 8GBUnknownBench 41%, 3 samples	3x
M393B5170EH1-CH9 9x4GBUnknownBench 32%, 2 samples	1x
9KSF25672AZ-1G4M1 4x2GBUnknownBench 37%, 14 samples	1x