Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive352% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer PI411
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '22 at 19:58
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 69.6
1-Core 163
2-Core 325
97% 186 Pts
4-Core 636
8-Core 1,027
102% 832 Pts
64-Core 1,287
80% 1,287 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 2014) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.51
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 151
Parallax 138
115% 143 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 109
Splatting 108
102% 127 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 108%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2276 2096 2185 2091 1467 1487 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
352% Outstanding
Read 2,499
Write 2,375
Mixed 1,846
SusWrite 1,934
486% 2,163 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 80.3
264% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,296
DQ Write 1,044
DQ Mixed 1,149
866% 1,163 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 352%
Great: 435%
SDXC Card 128GB
74GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 82 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 89.6
Write 78.3
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 83.8
106% 79 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 5
329% 5.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
64.5% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 25
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 28.2
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 75 23.8" 1280 720 HWV2402 HUAWEI AD80HW
Typical Blade 14 - RZ09-0370 Builds (Compare 470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback