Tsinghua H61H2-CM2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemTsinghua H61H2-CM2  (all builds)
MotherboardECS H61H2-CM2
Memory5.7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '22 at 03:08
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 180
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 339
44% 329 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
MSI(1462 2840) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.9% Poor
Lighting 29.4
Reflection 35
Parallax 28.3
24% 30.9 fps
MRender 42.3
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 34.1
27% 32.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Addlink SATA SSD 120GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0701A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 73 67 65 46 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.5% Below average
Read 214
Write 183
Mixed 192
SusWrite 80
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 15.5
72% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 81.5
DQ Mixed 18.9
24% 41.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
68GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 88 90 82 72 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 52
Write 84.6
Mixed 39
SusWrite 83.5
47% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 0443 RMR5030ED58E8W1600 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61H2-CM2 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Tsinghua H61H2-CM2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback