Emachines EL1358

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemEmachines EL1358  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines EL1358
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '22 at 03:28
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 840-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 96.7
44% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 192
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.77 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-128 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 158 151 154 151 116 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.2% Below average
Read 175
Write 149
Mixed 146
SusWrite 146
35% 154 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 19.9
69% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 22.4
DQ Write 65.9
DQ Mixed 30.1
27% 39.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
204GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 98 95 97 97 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 97.4
Write 88.7
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 94.7
61% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 Hynix HMT125U6DFR8C-H9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.9% Poor
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 10
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EL1358 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Emachines EL1358

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback