Today's hottest deals

HP p7-1423w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP p7-1423w  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150108
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 24 '22 at 00:57
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 205
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 511
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 36.8
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 38.4
30% 38.6 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 27.2
28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 139 100 139 121 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 240
Write 182
Mixed 175
SusWrite 120
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 25.2
83% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 149
110% 144 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 85%
Samsung HN-M101MBB 1TB-$32
931GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 110 111 109 110 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 97
Write 71.9
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 104
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 Kingston ACR512X64D3U13C9G 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1423w Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1423w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback