Today's hottest deals

MSI P67A-G45 (MS-7673)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7673
MotherboardMSI P67A-G45 (MS-7673)  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110331
Uptime22.6 Days
Run DateApr 24 '22 at 05:37
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 83.9
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 80.7
46% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 277
26% 214 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 4.5
4% 4.47 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 4
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39MND-2300A 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200L00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 183 200 179 205 212 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 350
Write 174
Mixed 220
SusWrite 194
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 19.5
70% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 21
DQ Write 79.7
DQ Mixed 25.4
27% 42 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 80%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$170
872GB free
Firmware: CC3H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 107 107 105 107 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 99.2
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 106
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.7
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67A-G45 (MS-7673) Builds (Compare 179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI P67A-G45 (MS-7673)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $471
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback