Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics82.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190308
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateApr 25 '22 at 01:18
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 54%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 39
2-Core 80.8
36% 58.4 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 151
17% 135 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$269
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.1% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 98.9
Parallax 107
82% 102 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 96.9
Splatting 89.4
82% 102 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pichau Gaming PG256X 256GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08435
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 182 182 162 181 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49% Average
Read 301
Write 245
Mixed 198
SusWrite 173
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 16
67% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 128
100% 135 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
541GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 152 153 148 156 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 157
Mixed 106
SusWrite 151
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G26C16U4B.8FD 859B BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.8% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 18.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $243
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback