Dell Precision M4700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemDell Precision M4700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 082H3V
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '17 at 18:43
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 180
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 448
49% 386 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M
Dell(1028 053E) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 320.49
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.02% Terrible
Lighting 3.33
Reflection 3.19
Parallax 3.44
3% 3.32 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 3
Splatting 5.57
4% 4.25 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.02%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-256M3M mSATT 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VZDC Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.2% Average
Read 263
Write 248
Mixed 258
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 16.4
54% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 52.1
65% 117 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 66%
Seagate Momentus Thin 7200 2.5" 320GB-$29
298GB free
Firmware: 0005 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 102
Write 109
Mixed 97.2
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.65
116% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-086.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M4700 Builds (Compare 470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M4700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback