Asus CS-B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CS-B  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '22 at 15:57
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 216
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 418
56% 418 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Lighting 41.1
Reflection 40
Parallax 53.8
34% 45 fps
MRender 55.4
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 40.5
39% 48.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128S3C 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 144 96 95 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 433
Mixed 419
SusWrite 107
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 46
160% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 247
207% 298 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 92%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
210GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 80 78 80 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 79.8
Write 74.5
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 79.3
55% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 65%
Seagate ST3750330NS 750GB-$91
344GB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 89 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 87.2
Write 12.7
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 88.4
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 60%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 159 160 160 159 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 162
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 160
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 0215 CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 18.4
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CS-B Builds (Compare 436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus CS-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback