Today's hottest deals

Positivo VJF155F11UAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPositivo VJF155F11UAR  (all builds)
MotherboardPOSITIVO VJF155F11UAR
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '22 at 23:42
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 161
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 282
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Clevo(1558 2410) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1339
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 7.3
5% 6.63 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 10.1
7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP600NS34 128GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 135 133 137 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 416
Write 137
Mixed 162
SusWrite 133
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 31.8
122% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 104
104% 171 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 86%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB
362GB free
Firmware: SE0OA4A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 79 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
44% Average
Read 74.2
Write 72.5
Mixed 18
SusWrite 79
44% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72.9% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 22.1
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 20
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VJF155F11UAR Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJF155F11UAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback