Today's hottest deals

Asrock 880GM-LE FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 880GM-LE FX  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 03 '17 at 13:46
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 83.7
1-Core 64.6
2-Core 121
56% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 192
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E218) 2GB
CLim: 920 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Lighting 27.7
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 32.9
23% 30 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 22
Splatting 34.8
23% 27.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 165
Mixed 165
121% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.35
115% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 109%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 64GB
60GB free, PID c75c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
5.69% Terrible
Read 22.1
Write 7.24
Mixed 9.57
14% 13 MB/s
4K Read 3.79
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.007
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.69%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10600CL9-2GBNT0 F3-10600CL9-2GBNT0 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 12.3
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 880GM-LE FX Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 880GM-LE FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback