Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4025 571 User benchmarks, average bench 25% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Memory 38.2 1-Core 65.2 2-Core 128 42% 77 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 118 16% 120 Pts	64-Core 123 8% 123 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2072) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.96% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 2.4 0% 1.63 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.7 2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.96% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB 5,673 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 146 147 147 148 146 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 305 Write 150 Mixed 169 SusWrite 147 43% 193 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 73.9 4K Mixed 23.2 109% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 180 140% 195 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 87%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB 5,753 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 12GB free, PID 557d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6 5.9 5.8 5.6 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	5.74% Terrible	Read 17.2 Write 4.2 Mixed 7.5 SusWrite 5.9 10% 8.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 49% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.74% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA266.C8FN 1x8GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.9% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 7.5 21% 7.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 4.9 13% 4.57 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4005IntelBench 28%, 1,572 samples	112x
Pentium Silver J5005IntelBench 40%, 2,202 samples	75x
Celeron J4025IntelBench 25%, 571 samples	66x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	178x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	107x

RAM
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GBG_SkillBench 27%, 42 samples	7x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	6x
GR2400S464L17S/8G Crucial CT4G4SFS824A.C8FBD 12GBUnknownBench 27%, 6 samples	6x

Value: 20% - Very poor

Total price: $25