PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7D23 |
Motherboard | MSI H510M PRO-E (MS-7D23) (all builds) |
Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210830 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 07 '22 at 16:48 |
Run Duration | 238 Seconds |
Run User | PRT-User |
Background CPU | 57% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron G5905
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
57.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
Asus(1043 86B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03190003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 146 63 65 63 61 MB/s
|
69.2%
Good
|
|||
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
147GB free
Firmware: 03190003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 239 69 70 68 68 MB/s
|
71.6%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown S3L4N2619081 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
45.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-10400FIntel $94Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 394x |
Core i3-10100FIntel $68Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 303x |
Core i5-11400FIntel $106Bench 94%, 46,609 samples | 236x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $152Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 176x |
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples | 140x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 137x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $271 |