Intel S2600STB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel S2600STB  (all builds)
Memory121.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200326
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 09 '22 at 12:48
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Silver 4110
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 68.1
1-Core 82
2-Core 159
59% 103 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 576
51% 430 Pts
64-Core 793
49% 793 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620
Nvidia(10DE 1264) 2GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 20.2
18% 23.4 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 22.5
19% 22.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
652GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1306 1201 1194 1133 1137 1141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,684
Write 1,205
Mixed 1,213
SusWrite 1,185
296% 1,322 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 56.6
200% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 794
DQ Write 499
DQ Mixed 650
484% 648 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 230%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 147 143 141 149 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 106
Write 98.7
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 146
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 90%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 32GB-$15
2GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 3.8 2.8 1.4 3.3 2.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 15.9
Write 4
SusWrite 4
8% 7.97 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 10%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
114GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 2.8 20 11 2.5 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
8.73% Terrible
Read 29.4
Write 6
Mixed 9.9
SusWrite 10.3
15% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
56% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.73%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965589-043.E00G 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.4% Outstanding
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 62.3
MC Mixed 31.7
116% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 8.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S2600STB Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO

Motherboard: Intel S2600STB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $294
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback