Today's hottest deals

Medion Erazer P6679 MD60382

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMedion Erazer P6679 MD60382  (all builds)
MotherboardMedion D15KHN
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '22 at 13:00
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 191
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 280
38% 281 Pts
64-Core 273
17% 273 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 62%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S11-256G-PHISON-SSD 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFD00.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 74 74 72 73 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 440
Write 282
Mixed 316
SusWrite 95.5
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 33.4
149% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 195
180% 277 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 83%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB
389GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 107 91 104 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 91.3
Write 96.4
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 98.3
58% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB Micron CT102464BF160B.M16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.2% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 19.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer P6679 MD60382 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer P6679 MD60382

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback