PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161118 |
Uptime | 15.7 Days |
Run Date | May 12 '22 at 06:09 |
Run Duration | 187 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.5%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
107GB free
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 166 187 125 90 61 MB/s
|
42.1%
Average
|
|||
Samsung HD253GJ 250GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 31 61 88 94 81 MB/s
|
39.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate M3 Portable 500GB
119GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Hitachi HDT721032SLA380 320GB
71GB free
Firmware: ST2OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 71 71 71 70 MB/s
|
40.3%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 445x |
FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 300x |
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 181x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 184x |
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples | 90x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 88x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $174 |