Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '22 at 08:32
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$95
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 202
28% 205 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 3.2
2% 3.17 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 0.3
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GSSD230S 128GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427GN1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 380 388 375 384 359 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 378
Mixed 380
SusWrite 374
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 50.9
180% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 219
186% 269 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$39
893GB free
Firmware: 01.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 100 98 99 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 113
Write 94.8
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 98.7
66% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK4GX4M1A2400C16 0875 JHD2666U1904JG 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 21.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 19.7
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 6,256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback