HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1661
Memory4.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '22 at 12:45
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion II P560
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 23.4
2-Core 73.4
39% 57.5 Pts
4-Core 70.3
8-Core 65.6
9% 67.9 Pts
64-Core 73.5
4% 73.5 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
HP(103C 1661) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 0.8
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.1
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SUPERSONIC256 256GB
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1130A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 173 195 194 203 174 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.1% Average
Read 230
Write 196
Mixed 203
SusWrite 186
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 12.4
48% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 94.6
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 34.1
47% 84.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 162%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
366GB free
Firmware: JE4OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 80 91 91 93 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 79.7
Write 88.2
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 87.2
54% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
25.9% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 9.8
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion g6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback