Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210608
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '22 at 21:42
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 47.1
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 114
42% 72.9 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 227
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.57% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 0.3
1% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.57%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Airdisk 128GB SSD 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 351 344 343 338 252 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 373
Write 353
Mixed 319
SusWrite 331
78% 344 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 33.1
121% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 134
120% 177 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
26.6% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 11.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.8
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback