HP p6-2133la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP p6-2133la  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '17 at 04:24
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$77
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 157
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 216
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.19
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.69 fps
MRender 0.57
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.13
1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 750GB-$55
667GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 87.5
Write 74.1
Mixed 101
66% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.84
4K Mixed 0.27
70% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
586GB free
Firmware: JP4O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 96.2
Mixed 99.8
75% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.37
78% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 58.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
34% Below average
Read 60.7
Write 57.9
Mixed 58
44% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.16
44% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G4M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback