Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 13:15
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 79.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 231
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 472
63% 473 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1345 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.9% Average
Lighting 55.3
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 75.6
45% 48.2 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 47
47% 59.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 960GB-$48
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 452 454 451 445 449 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 175
Write 106
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 446
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 11.7
52% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 15.2
DQ Mixed 14.3
11% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 104%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
778GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 98 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 86.7
Write 99.1
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 97.8
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4B.8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 36.5
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 29.8
94% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback